« September 2024 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View Profile
World Pledge Discussion Board
Friday, 20 February 2004
In Memoriam: The White Rose, Feb. 22, 1943
On Feb. 22, 1943, three courageous young Germans were executed by the Nazis in Munich. The young people -- all in their 20s -- were Hans and Sophie Scholl, a brother and sister, and their friend Christoph Probst. Their crime? They, along with a tiny handful of others, produced and distributed a series of six anti-Hitler leaflets. Caught while scattering copies of their last leaflet, they were quickly tried, sentenced and guillotined (that was the standard German method of civilian execution). By all accounts, each of them died with great composure and dignity. By the end of the year, three of their associates -- Alexander Schmorell, Prof. Kurt Huber and Willi Graf -- were also apprehended and executed. On Jan. 29, 1945, a seventh member of their circle -- Hans Leipilt -- was executed.

These anti-Hitler young Germans called themselves "The White Rose." The origin of the name is shrouded in some mystery; but its connotations -- peace, purity and, possibly, secrecy -- seem plain enough. Hans, Sophie, Christoph and the others died for doing what I'm doing right now -- speaking one's mind. They did not kill anyone, not did they try to. They confronted the most ruthless, diabolical regime of the modern era with a mimeograph machine and raw courage. In so doing, they lost their lives, but redeemed a fragment of Germany's honor from Nazism.

These poor, murdered children, who risked everything with so little hope of success, were German patriots. But they were also world patriots. They died for the ideal of a common human bond that extends beyond nationalism. Their values -- truth, justice and decency -- are the foundation on which any world worth living in must rest.

May God be good to them.

To learn more about "The White Rose," click here.

Posted by worldpledge at 7:58 PM EST
Updated: Friday, 20 February 2004 8:05 PM EST
Thursday, 12 February 2004
God, Country and the World Pledge
Once upon a time, when I was a child in summer Bible school, I was taught a "Pledge to the Christian Flag," which began, "I pledge allegiance to the Christian flag and to the Savior for whose Kingdom it stands...."

I doubt that the nice ladies who taught me that pledge thought that it was even the slightest bit contradictory or confusing to children to pledge allegiance to the flag of Jesus one minute and to that of the U.S.A. the next. Loyalties to God and country went hand-in-hand back then, as long as the country was "under God."

That brings me to the point of this entry: there's no inherent contradiction in pledging allegiance to Jesus, the U.S.A. and humanity in total. Thoughtful people know that tensions exist between faith and citizenship. But there is a hierarchy of loyalties that even the U.S. Congress recognized when it added the words "under God" to the Pledge of Allegiance in 1954.

I'm not interested in entering the fray as to whether the words "under God" convert the U.S. pledge into a religious exercise. I only cite the phrase to show that no American should be reproached as unpatriotic for expressing a wider loyalty, which is what the World Pledge does.

Neither should anyone be reproached for not wanting to say any kind of pledge at all. The American flag is not the same thing as the Constitution of the United States; the Christian flag is not the same thing as the Kingdom of God; the Earth is more than the dirt under our feet. Pledges are aspirational. If people do not feel the spirit behind the words, then they should not be made to speak them.

Posted by worldpledge at 12:22 PM EST
Updated: Thursday, 12 February 2004 4:38 PM EST
Saturday, 7 February 2004
The World Pledge: What's the Point?
So, what's the point of the World Pledge? Is it just another one of those warm fuzzies that appeals to liberals, Quakers, Unitarians, Maryknoll priests and other assorted peaceniks and eco-sentimentalists? Or, more darkly, is it the thin entering wedge of a plot to coerce expressions of planetary patriotism in the same way that we now coerce expressions of national patriotism, especially from impressionable school children?

I wrote the World Pledge, or if you prefer, this version of it (there are others) as a way to help stretch people's vision beyond the horizon of narrow nationalism. I don't expect it to supplant traditional patriotic rituals like the recitation of the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance. I don't want anyone compelled to say it. I don't think it should be focused on some material object like the flag of the United Nations or even an image of the Earth itself. I want it used, when people truly feel like using it, as an expression of larger loyalties, not necessarily as a negation of smaller ones.

John Wesley described his religious faith as a warming of the heart. That is how I think that any truly positive emotional experience is felt: whether it is the realization of God's love, of one's own love for another individual, or of the things that make one's country worthy of love and sacrifice. It is something quiet and persistant, the very opposite of pep-rally patriotism.

I would like the World Pledge to be a help to people who wish to express a warm-hearted love of our miraculous world and of the tremendous potential of human beings for doing good. Please don't hesitate to respond to this post with your own ideas about how the World Pledge might be used. I'd also welcome translations. Running this site is not my full-time job, so please be patient if your response doesn't appear quickly. Needless to say, no rants from either right or left will be posted.

Posted by worldpledge at 8:33 PM EST
Updated: Monday, 9 February 2004 1:25 PM EST

Newer | Latest | Older